Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goericke, R.
Right arrow Articles by Welschmeyer, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goericke, R.
Right arrow Articles by Welschmeyer, N. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 20 | NUMBER 12 | PAGES 2223-2249 | 1998
© Oxford University Press

research-article

Response of Sargasso Sea phytoplankton biomass, growth rates and primary production to seasonally varying physical forcing

Ralf Goericke and Nicholas A. Welschmeyer1

Marine Life Research Group, Scripps Institution of Oceanography 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0218 1Moss Landing Marine Laboratories Moss Landing, CA 95039-0450, USA

Received on November 21, 1996; accepted on May 27, 1998 The response of phytoplankton biomass, growth rates and primary production to seasonally varying physical forcing was studied at a station southeast of Bermuda over an 18 month period. Phytoplankton growth rates and primary production were measured using the pigment-labeling method, and phytoplankton biomass was calculated from these measurements. Phytoplankton carbon biomass varied systematically over the year. Highest values were observed during the winter and spring. Seasonal variations of chlorophyll (Chi) a in the surface layer could primarily be attributed to variations in phytoplankton biomass and secondarily to photoacclimation. During the summer period, average values of carbon (C)/Chl ratios (g C g–1 Chi) ranged from 160 at the surface to 33 at the 1.6% light level, changes attributed to photoacclimation of the phytoplankton, consistent with the observation that phytoplankton biomass did not vary as a function of depth. Phytoplankton growth rates in the surface layer did not vary systematically over the year, ranging from 0.15 to 0.45 day–1, in spite of seasonally varying concentrations of nitrate. Growth rates varied as a function of depth from average values of 0.3 day–1 in the surface layer to <0.1 day~1 at the 1.6% light level. Thus, the primary response of the phytoplankton community to nutrient enrichment during the winter period was an increase in phytoplankton biomass rather than an increase in growth rates. A simple nutrient-phyto-plankton-zooplankton model was used to explore this phenomenon. The model demonstrated that the observed response of the phytoplankton to nutrient enrichment is only possible when phytoplankton growth is not severely limited by nutrients.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.