Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on October 5, 2005
Journal of Plankton Research 2005 27(11):1195-1203; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbi081
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/11/1195    most recent
fbi081v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calbet, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vaqué, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Calbet, A.
Right arrow Articles by Vaqué, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

SHORT COMMUNICATION

Zooplankton biomass distribution patterns along the western Antarctic Peninsula (December 2002)

Albert Calbet*, Miquel Alcaraz, Dacha Atienza, Elisabetta Broglio and Dolors Vaqué

Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), P. Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain

* Corresponding Author: acalbet{at}icm.csic.es

The authors, after the first, are in alphabetical order
Received May 10, 2005; accepted in principle August 25, 2005; accepted for publication October 3, 2005; published online October 5, 2005
Communicating editor: R.P. Harris

The phytoplankton [chlorophyll a (Chl a)], microzooplankton, mesozooplankton and macrozooplankton biomass and distribution were studied as part of a multidisciplinary project (Tempano) along the Antarctic Peninsula during December 2002. Even though the summer phytoplankton bloom was not yet developed in the area, autotrophs dominated the plankton biomass. Phytoplankton vertical distribution was, in general, homogeneous in the upper 40–50 m of the water column, further decreasing with depth. Protozoans showed low biomass; their contribution to the total plankton being one order of magnitude lower than that of autotrophs. The vertical distribution of protozoans was variable among stations with marked peaks at depths ranging from 30 to 80 m. Mesozooplankton-integrated biomass was generally low, although there was a notable increase southward near the ice marginal zone. Macrozooplankton distribution was more variable without any clear zonal distribution pattern. The vertical distribution of meso- and macrozooplankton (>4 mm) biomass showed clear peaks of abundance comprising different species depending on the geographical area. Our biomass distribution data suggest a food-web scenario in which macrozooplankton are preying on mesozooplankton populations only in the northerner stations, and mesozooplankton are, in their turn, shaping the abundance of the emerging populations of microzooplankton. Phytoplankton, on the other hand, seem to be hardly controlled by grazing activity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.