Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on November 16, 2007
Journal of Plankton Research 2008 30(2):183-197; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbm088
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/2/183    most recent
fbm088v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharples, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sharples, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press

Potential impacts of the spring-neap tidal cycle on shelf sea primary production

Jonathan Sharples*

Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory, 6 Brownlow Street, Liverpool L3 5DA, UK

* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: j.sharples{at}pol.ac.uk

Received on July 5, 2007; accepted on November 6, 2007


  Abstract

Spring-neap modulation of tidal mixing could potentially have significant effects on the timing and magnitude of primary production in stratified shelf seas. A 1D turbulence model, coupled to a simple model of primary production, is used to identify potential spring-neap impacts. According to this model, changes in the timing of the spring-neap cycle could contribute 10% of inter-annual variability of bloom timing in weak tidal regimes and 25% in areas with stronger tidal currents. In stratified regions away from the tidal mixing fronts, the spring-neap cycle is predicted to result in periodicity in the biological rates within the thermocline, and the turbulent flux of organic carbon into the bottom water. The strongest impacts are predicted within 15–50 km of the tidal mixing fronts, with increases in sub-surface primary production and carbon export. At the fronts, there is substantial extra primary production driven by the spring-neap cycle, contributing an extra 70% annually compared to fronts forced by the M2 tide only. This impact is reflected in the organic carbon mixed downward into the bottom waters near the front. The results have important implications for the interpretation of observations of primary production, and for the resolution required by shelf-wide models of the marine ecosystem.

Communicating editor: K.J. Flynn


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.