Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on January 27, 2008
Journal of Plankton Research 2008 30(4):423-438; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbn007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
30/4/423    most recent
fbn007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flynn, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Flynn, K. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The importance of the form of the quota curve and control of non-limiting nutrient transport in phytoplankton models

Kevin J. Flynn*

Institute of Environmental Sustainability, Swansea University, Wallace Building, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales, UK

* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: k.j.flynn{at}swansea.ac.uk

Received on November 16, 2007; revised on January 10, 2008; accepted on January 13, 2008


  Abstract

The description of phytoplankton growth and nutrient acquisition plays a pivotal role in affecting the performance of plankton ecosystem models. A comparison was made between the behaviour of multi-nutrient phytoplankton models with alternative descriptions of the relationships between the nutrient:C quota and growth rate (µ) and for the control of the transport of the non-limiting nutrient. Using Droop kinetics (i.e. employing a hyperbolic curve form fixed by the ratio of maximum:minimum quotas), or conversely a linear quota–µ relationship, gave models that could display behaviour in strong disagreement with that of the optimal model when operated in a dynamic scenario. The appropriate description of the control of the transport of the non-limiting nutrient is also important; in particular, a fixed algal N:P should not be assumed. Behaviour was most likely to be aberrant when P was limiting; behaviour under nutrient limitation when the N:P nutrient supply ratio accorded with Redfield expectations (16:1 mole) was least aberrant. Deviations of model output from expected behaviour would affect the simulation of the dynamics of phytoplankton growth, nutrient cycling, competition and have serious repercussions in models in which the stoichiometric quality of the phytoplankton prey affects zooplankton activity. It is important that the behaviour of phytoplankton behaviour accords with that of the groups they purport to represent. However, we currently lack the data upon which to parameterize such models.

Corresponding editor: Roger Harris


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.